GRE Verbal Reasoning Practice: Reading Comprehension
- Reading Comprehension
- 15 questions
- 25 minutes
About half of GRE Verbal Reasoning questions are based on reading passages, and each passage has one to six questions. This test has four original passages and 15 questions with one answer from four options; the GRE itself uses five options and also has multiple-answer and select-in-passage questions. Answer only from what the passage says, not from outside knowledge.
Tap an option to mark your answer. You can change your mind, or tap the same option again to leave the question blank. The correct answers and explanations appear when you finish the test.Tap an option to answer; tap it again to leave the question blank.
Your result
- 0 correct
- 0 wrong
- 0 blank
-
Question 1
Passage A
(1) Popular histories of standard time usually tell a simple story. Before the railroads, every town set its clocks by the sun, so that noon in one town fell a few minutes earlier or later than noon in a town a short distance to the west. Once trains began to pass through dozens of such towns in a day, the confusion became intolerable, and in 1883 the railroads of the United States and Canada replaced the patchwork with a handful of standard zones. In this telling, technology created a problem and then imposed its solution, and the public simply reset its watches.
(2) The story is not false, but it leaves out how unevenly the new time was accepted. The railroads' zones had no legal standing: Congress did not write standard time into federal law until 1918. In the intervening decades, some towns adopted railroad time at once, while others kept their own sun time for years, and in a few places public clocks displayed both. Opponents were not merely nostalgic. To a farmer whose day was governed by daylight, a clock set to a distant meridian could seem an imposition by a private company that had no business regulating local life.
(3) Seen this way, standard time looks less like a technical fix than like a negotiation, one in which the convenience of long-distance commerce was weighed against the claims of local custom. That the railroads' system eventually prevailed does not mean the outcome was inevitable, nor that those who resisted it misunderstood what was at stake.
The primary purpose of the passage is to
Correct answer: B
The author calls the popular story "not false" but incomplete and then describes uneven acceptance and reasoned opposition. The author never says the railroads should have been stopped, and the passage suggests slower, not faster, adoption.
-
Question 2
Passage A (see above):
The author mentions the year 1918 in paragraph 2 primarily in order to
Correct answer: D
The date directly supports the claim that "the railroads' zones had no legal standing" for many years. The railroads introduced the zones in 1883, and the author says only that some towns resisted, not most.
-
Question 3
Passage A (see above):
The author's attitude toward the account described in paragraph 1 is best described as
Correct answer: A
Paragraph 2 opens with "The story is not false, but it leaves out" part of what happened, which is acceptance with a reservation. Calling the account a myth goes far beyond "not false."
-
Question 4
Passage A (see above):
In paragraph 2, the sentence "Opponents were not merely nostalgic" serves mainly to
Correct answer: C
The sentence that follows gives a real objection: a private company was regulating local life. The word "merely" shows the author is going beyond sentiment, not conceding that the opposition was only sentimental.
-
Question 5
Passage A (see above):
Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the passage about the years between 1883 and 1918?
Correct answer: B
Some towns adopted railroad time at once while others kept sun time, so neighboring towns could differ. There was no federal law to enforce, and only "a few places" had clocks showing both times.
-
Question 6
Passage B
In many tree species, such as oaks and beeches, seed production does not rise and fall gently from year to year. Instead, whole populations produce almost no seeds for several years and then, in the same year, an enormous crop. Because a tree that withholds seeds gives up chances to reproduce, ecologists have long asked what this synchrony, known as masting, gains. One explanation holds that masting overwhelms seed predators: in lean years the populations of mice and insects that eat seeds stay small, so in a mast year they can consume only a fraction of the crop, and many seeds survive. A second explanation points to pollination. Oaks and beeches are pollinated by wind, a wasteful process, and a tree is far more likely to have its flowers fertilized when all its neighbors are releasing pollen at once. The two explanations are not mutually exclusive, and a species might benefit in both ways, but they make different predictions about which species should mast most strongly.
The passage is primarily concerned with
Correct answer: A
The passage introduces masting, says why it is puzzling, and sets out the predator and pollination explanations. The inefficiency of wind pollination is mentioned only in support of the second explanation.
-
Question 7
Passage B (see above):
Which of the following findings would most clearly support the pollination explanation over the predator explanation?
Correct answer: C
If masting stays strong where predators are not a factor and tracks wind pollination, the pollination explanation gains and the predator explanation cannot account for it. Mice eating a smaller share in mast years is exactly what the predator explanation predicts.
-
Question 8
Passage B (see above):
According to the passage, why have ecologists considered masting puzzling?
Correct answer: D
The passage states that "a tree that withholds seeds gives up chances to reproduce," which is why ecologists ask what masting gains. Oaks and beeches are wind-pollinated, so masting is clearly not limited to animal-pollinated species.
-
Question 9
Passage B (see above):
The final sentence suggests that the two explanations
Correct answer: B
Different predictions "about which species should mast most strongly" imply that comparing species could tell the explanations apart. The same sentence says they are "not mutually exclusive," so they can both hold for one species.
-
Question 10
Passage C
When traffic on a congested highway grows worse, the usual response is to add lanes. Transportation researchers have repeatedly found, however, that within a few years the wider road is often about as congested as before. The explanation is not that planners underestimated future population growth. Rather, a less crowded road lowers the cost, in time, of driving on it, and people respond: some who had traveled at other hours shift to rush hour, some who had taken other routes switch to the highway, and some who had not made certain trips at all begin to make them. The new capacity is filled by trips that congestion itself had been suppressing. It follows that widening a road may be justified by the additional trips it allows, but it should not be promoted as a cure for congestion.
Which of the following best states the main point of the passage?
Correct answer: C
The passage explains that new lanes fill with trips that congestion had been suppressing, so widening should not be sold as a cure. It explicitly rejects population forecasting as the explanation.
-
Question 11
Passage C (see above):
The sentence "The explanation is not that planners underestimated future population growth" functions mainly to
Correct answer: A
Before giving its own explanation ("Rather, …"), the passage rules out an obvious rival one. It says nothing about the population declining or about researchers' methods.
-
Question 12
Passage C (see above):
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the explanation offered in the passage?
Correct answer: D
If the renewed congestion came only from population growth that happened just as fast elsewhere, the widening did not draw new trips, which is the very explanation the passage rejected. Drivers switching from side streets and more trips per day support the passage.
-
Question 13
Passage D
Many Victorian novels, including most of Charles Dickens's, first reached readers not as books but in installments, published weekly or monthly over a year or more. Critics have sometimes treated this fact as a regrettable commercial pressure, blaming it for the sprawling plots and dangling subplots of the period's fiction. Yet serial publication also gave novelists something few novelists enjoy today: an audience whose response could be gauged while the work was still being written. Sales of each part were known within days, and letters from readers arrived long before the last chapter was drafted. A novelist who sensed that a minor character had captured the public's affection could enlarge that character's role; one who saw sales sag could change direction. To read these novels as if they had been conceived whole is therefore to misunderstand them, for their loose structure often records a conversation between writer and public.
The author regards the critics mentioned in the second sentence as
Correct answer: B
"Yet" introduces a benefit the critics ignore, namely feedback from readers during writing. The author does not dispute that the novels were serialized and never singles out Dickens as an exception.
-
Question 14
Passage D (see above):
According to the passage, serial publication allowed novelists to
Correct answer: C
The passage says a novelist could enlarge a popular character or change direction when sales fell, while the novel was still being written. Finishing the novel first would rule out that kind of response.
-
Question 15
Passage D (see above):
In the final sentence, "conceived whole" most nearly means
Correct answer: A
The author contrasts novels shaped during serialization with novels fully worked out in advance, so "conceived whole" refers to how the work was planned. Publishing format is a separate matter from conception.
Questions you leave blank are not counted as wrong.